<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Calling &#8216;em Out: The World&#8217;s 10 Worst Greenwashers</title> <atom:link href="http://webecoist.com/2009/03/22/greenwash-worlds-worst-greenwashers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://webecoist.com/2009/03/22/greenwash-worlds-worst-greenwashers/</link> <description>Green Design, Sustainable Technology and Environmental Oddities</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:56:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Fuels Paradise: THUMS Islands Help Big Oil Look Good &#124; WebEcoist</title><link>http://webecoist.com/2009/03/22/greenwash-worlds-worst-greenwashers/comment-page-1/#comment-94853</link> <dc:creator>Fuels Paradise: THUMS Islands Help Big Oil Look Good &#124; WebEcoist</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:02:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://webecoist.com/?p=5889#comment-94853</guid> <description>[...] Help Big Oil Look GoodBy Steve in Energy &amp; Fuel, History &amp; Trivia, Nature &amp; Ecosystems Greenwashing may be a new term but it has deep roots. Take the THUMS Islands, for instance. Constructed in the [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Help Big Oil Look GoodBy Steve in Energy &amp; Fuel, History &amp; Trivia, Nature &amp; Ecosystems Greenwashing may be a new term but it has deep roots. Take the THUMS Islands, for instance. Constructed in the [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dark Optimism &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Interactive Carbon IQ Test, and real climate change solutions</title><link>http://webecoist.com/2009/03/22/greenwash-worlds-worst-greenwashers/comment-page-1/#comment-75350</link> <dc:creator>Dark Optimism &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Interactive Carbon IQ Test, and real climate change solutions</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:19:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://webecoist.com/?p=5889#comment-75350</guid> <description>[...] and reduce the amount that is already up there. Soil carbon can truly claim, without a hint of greenwash, to be one of nature&#8217;s own [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and reduce the amount that is already up there. Soil carbon can truly claim, without a hint of greenwash, to be one of nature&#8217;s own [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anita Kaiser</title><link>http://webecoist.com/2009/03/22/greenwash-worlds-worst-greenwashers/comment-page-1/#comment-48726</link> <dc:creator>Anita Kaiser</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:27:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://webecoist.com/?p=5889#comment-48726</guid> <description>Awesome blog!  It is amazing the lengths companies will go to to try and trick consumers!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome blog!  It is amazing the lengths companies will go to to try and trick consumers!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mardi</title><link>http://webecoist.com/2009/03/22/greenwash-worlds-worst-greenwashers/comment-page-1/#comment-41042</link> <dc:creator>Mardi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 10:10:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://webecoist.com/?p=5889#comment-41042</guid> <description>I had a little cry when I saw the advert on the orangutans regarding the palm oil crises. I had no idea about the palm oil. I will so be sooooo getting  the word out there.
Thank You for the insight to this.Regards,
Mardi</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a little cry when I saw the advert on the orangutans regarding the palm oil crises. I had no idea about the palm oil. I will so be sooooo getting  the word out there.<br
/> Thank You for the insight to this.</p><p>Regards,<br
/> Mardi</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Green Consumerism: How green is it actually? : Green Resouces</title><link>http://webecoist.com/2009/03/22/greenwash-worlds-worst-greenwashers/comment-page-1/#comment-38814</link> <dc:creator>Green Consumerism: How green is it actually? : Green Resouces</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 02:02:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://webecoist.com/?p=5889#comment-38814</guid> <description>[...] Via: Greenbiz, WebEcoist [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via: Greenbiz, WebEcoist [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Monsanto, nanoparticles, and greenwashing &#124; The Canary Report</title><link>http://webecoist.com/2009/03/22/greenwash-worlds-worst-greenwashers/comment-page-1/#comment-35012</link> <dc:creator>Monsanto, nanoparticles, and greenwashing &#124; The Canary Report</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:20:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://webecoist.com/?p=5889#comment-35012</guid> <description>[...] WebEcoist reports on the world&#8217;s 10 worst greenwashers. Oh look, there&#8217;s Monsanto: Monsanto, the world’s largest seed and pesticide company, is [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WebEcoist reports on the world&#8217;s 10 worst greenwashers. Oh look, there&#8217;s Monsanto: Monsanto, the world’s largest seed and pesticide company, is [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Analiese&#8217;s Reading 3/31 &#124; Quiche Moraine</title><link>http://webecoist.com/2009/03/22/greenwash-worlds-worst-greenwashers/comment-page-1/#comment-33850</link> <dc:creator>Analiese&#8217;s Reading 3/31 &#124; Quiche Moraine</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:17:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://webecoist.com/?p=5889#comment-33850</guid> <description>[...] WebEcoist [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WebEcoist [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Green News Round-up #12 &#8212; Green Pepper</title><link>http://webecoist.com/2009/03/22/greenwash-worlds-worst-greenwashers/comment-page-1/#comment-33295</link> <dc:creator>Green News Round-up #12 &#8212; Green Pepper</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:49:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://webecoist.com/?p=5889#comment-33295</guid> <description>[...] &#8216;em out: the world’s 10 worst greenwashers From WebEcoist on 22 March 2009 As the green movement sweeps the globe, companies, trade groups and government [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8216;em out: the world’s 10 worst greenwashers From WebEcoist on 22 March 2009 As the green movement sweeps the globe, companies, trade groups and government [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: j.williams</title><link>http://webecoist.com/2009/03/22/greenwash-worlds-worst-greenwashers/comment-page-1/#comment-33027</link> <dc:creator>j.williams</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:19:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://webecoist.com/?p=5889#comment-33027</guid> <description>G Throne, I assume that they are taking into consideration waste produced by the energy used to extract, process, and transport the oil from the shale.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G Throne, I assume that they are taking into consideration waste produced by the energy used to extract, process, and transport the oil from the shale.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: G THRONE</title><link>http://webecoist.com/2009/03/22/greenwash-worlds-worst-greenwashers/comment-page-1/#comment-33006</link> <dc:creator>G THRONE</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:12:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://webecoist.com/?p=5889#comment-33006</guid> <description>Could someone else check the math on the item about BP?
If the figures I&#039;ve obtained from the &#039;net are correct, crude oil (which floats), weighs a bit less than 7-1/2 pounds per US gallon.  That makes the standard 42 US gallon barrel of crude oil a net oil weight about 315 lbs.  The post states that a barrel of crude will yield approximately 1340 lbs of carbon dioxide.  How does the consumption of 1 pound of oil yield 4 pounds of one waste product?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could someone else check the math on the item about BP?<br
/> If the figures I&#8217;ve obtained from the &#8216;net are correct, crude oil (which floats), weighs a bit less than 7-1/2 pounds per US gallon.  That makes the standard 42 US gallon barrel of crude oil a net oil weight about 315 lbs.  The post states that a barrel of crude will yield approximately 1340 lbs of carbon dioxide.  How does the consumption of 1 pound of oil yield 4 pounds of one waste product?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/17 queries in 1.054 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.webecoist.com

Served from: acmkokecoc.gs01.gridserver.com @ 2010-03-19 21:44:52 -->